Re: Gstreamer Player "Livin' la vida loca" 0.6.0 released
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- To: =?iso-8859-15?q?Carlos_Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= <carlos gnome org>
- Cc: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, uraeus linuxrising org, Gstreamer-Devel <gstreamer-devel lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: Gstreamer Player "Livin' la vida loca" 0.6.0 released
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:56:49 +0800
On 15/09/2003 3:26 AM, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
But if you have a mix of GPL and LGPL code, and it's not separated as
libraries, automaticly all code is GPL, that's the "problem". The fact
is that if they are the code owners, it's just that the code they are
releasing has a dual license, LGPL and GPL.
The combined work must be licensed under the GPL because of the single
GPL component. However, the individual files can have other licenses,
as long as they are compatible with the GPL. The LGPL license is
definitely GPL compatible.
As it stands, someone could take the release, remove the playlist and
they would be left with only LGPL code. They would be in their rights
to treat the remainder that way too.
There doesn't seem to be any problem here.
James.
--
Email: james daa com au
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]