Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.0 Development Release



On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:06:52PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="garnacho tuxerver net">
> 
> > > We're basically stuck. I had hoped that aggressive releases were an
> > > assumed part of the GTK+ 2.4 plan [1], but that doesn't appear to be the
> > > case. I will ask Owen if we can roll some pre-release tarballs, because
> > > it is very important that we get all of this new stuff tested up front.
> > 
> > but even if those pre-release tarballs don't happen before 2.5.0,
> > compiling against gtk HEAD is a requirement, isn't it? or just compiling
> > against 2.2 will be fine?
> 
> If we do pre-release tarballs, they'll be available for 2.5.0 (otherwise you
> won't be able to build half of the existing modules).

I guess it was an stupid question :-P... ok, then I'll have to check as soon
as possible that everything works in the gnome system tools with gtk HEAD

thanks

> 
> - Jeff
> 
> -- 
> linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia         http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
>  
>    You know the end is nigh when modern art is relegated to the status of
>                                   "meme".
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]