Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.0 Development Release
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: Xan Lopez <xan masilla org>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.5.0 Development Release
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:21:06 -0400
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 03:15, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Xan Lopez">
>
> > El lun, 20-10-2003 a las 03:38, Jeff Waugh escribi?:
> > > Good morning all,
> > (snip)
> > > If you're already in the modules list, you know the drill. :-)
> >
> > So, I wonder what should modules depending already on GTK+ HEAD do. Just
> > wait without releases until a GTK+ 2.3.0 release is out? If that release
> > takes a lot of time we could get into serious troubles, missing several
> > phases of the release process.
> >
> > We (Epiphany) already depend on a lot of features from GTK+ HEAD, so I
> > guess it's too late to go back (or at least an incredible PAIN).
>
> We're basically stuck. I had hoped that aggressive releases were an assumed
> part of the GTK+ 2.4 plan [1], but that doesn't appear to be the case. I
> will ask Owen if we can roll some pre-release tarballs, because it is very
> important that we get all of this new stuff tested up front.
I'll do GLib/Pango/GTK+ releases this week. We might even get in some
form of GtkFileChooser ... if not, that will be 2.3.1.
Regards,
Owen
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]