Re: 2.4 Module List and Rationale (aka GEP10 and 11)
- From: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>
- To: John Fleck <jfleck inkstain net>
- Cc: gnome-hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, GNOME Desktop List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: 2.4 Module List and Rationale (aka GEP10 and 11)
- Date: 16 Mar 2003 16:53:53 +0000
Hey,
> The search tool is the only thing in there that is really part of the
> basic infrastructure. If gnome-utils is disbanded into individual
> packages, would the search tool become its own package?
Well, we still have gnome-dictionary and gnome-system-log in there too.
I'm not quite sure what to do about these.
The main issue is the lack of maintainance on these modules
[gnome-search-tool aside]. I simply won't have time to give them the
love they need - in some cases, the code is really horrible and could do
with someone rewriting large parts of it.
> I assume zenity will be a stand-alone package? I assume from this
> discussion that you are not planning its inclusion in the core
> application list?
Yes, I think I'd prefer it to be like that. Actually, I see zenity being
a replacement for gdialog that could be part of the core list - not sure
if it's really desktop material though in terms of it's usefulness
[shrug].
See ya,
Glynn ;)
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]