Re: lufs and gnome-vfs

[Roberto Majadas <phoenix nova es>]

El mar, 04-03-2003 a las 00:57, iain escribió:
> man, 2003-03-03 kl. 23:15 skrev Bastien Nocera:
> 
> > Until that's done, it's a no-no. If you fancy spending your time
> > creating and then fixing kernel modules for things like HP-UX and
> > Solaris, go for it.
> > 
> > But at that point in time, lufs isn't an option for gnome-vfs.
> 
> I don't see why not, at least not based on the "other OSes can't support
> it" reason. If its a compile time option and isn't a fixed requirement,
> then IMO it's fine, so long as someone wants to write it.
> 
> Not all OSes version of X handles things like XRender, but I don't see
> that stopping GTK from using it where its available.

That's true too :)

Roberto

> 
> Catering to the lowest common demoninator will leave us languishing,
> afraid to support anything remotely interesting because some other
> systems can't use it.
> 
> Of course, any other arguments based on technical merits (or lack
> thereof) of lufs are perfectly valid reasons though
> iain
> 
> -- 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-vfs-list mailing list
> gnome-vfs-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
> 

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers