Re: CVSROOT/modules

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

Mark McLoughlin wrote:

> Hey Guys,
> 	Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is absolutely no need for
> things like
>
> libbonobo libbonobo
> libbonoboui libbonoboui
> libcompat libcompat
> libgnome libgnome
> libgnomebase libgnomebase
> libgnomecanvas libgnomecanvas
> libgnomeui libgnomeui
> libgnome-extra libgnome-extra
> libgnomeprint libgnomeprint
>
> 	in this file? If so, why on earth do we do it so religiously?
> I think this is just leading to the confusion for some people that in
> order to import into cvs you need to put an entry into modules.
I would just get rid of the lines.  We used to use cvs virtual includes 
(&intl &macros), so had lines for almost every module.  Then we started 
removing the virtual includes, leaving just the "module module" bit. 
Then I guess some people just continued adding them from habbit.

For the modules that have 1.4 and 2.0 branches, we still need &macros 
for the 1.4 branch.  We could probably remove those lines in a few 
months though, when gnome 2.0 becomes more popular.

James.

--
Email: james daa com au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/



_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers