Re: Enter the build sheriff: Jacob.
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: hp redhat com (Havoc Pennington)
- Cc: alan redhat com (Alan Cox), snickell stanford edu (Seth Nickell), veillard redhat com, gnome-hackers gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Enter the build sheriff: Jacob.
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:27:05 -0500 (EST)
> When we can't afford the testing, we have to go with prior art and
> research and general principles based on those, and that is 100% the
> right approach.
Prior art without understanding which bits are good or caused by 20 year
old lawsuits ? Oh dear me.
> The problem is that the fastest way to accomodate traditional users is
> usually to add a configuration option. That's the trap we have to
> avoid at all costs, in favor of fixing the defaults to address the
> root issues.
Broken is still broken. When was the last time you read in a newspaper
about someone being asked a no/yes question ?
Let me quote google
yes/no 2.3 million hits (a lot are yes,no,no things
no/yes 640,000 hits on both of these due to google)
"yes or no" 441,000
"no or yes" 4870
Begin to get the picture ?
441,000 web page authors know the right ordering.
Alan
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]