Re: [Usability]Re: User interface suggestion for panels
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- Cc: Sinzui Kobalt <sinzui cox rr com>, Usability <usability gnome org>, gnome-hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability]Re: User interface suggestion for panels
- Date: 01 Mar 2002 10:54:06 -0500
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 19:57, Seth Nickell wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 05:55, Sinzui Kobalt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 19:47, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 17:02, William McVey wrote:
> > > > 4. The Dock ignores Fitts's Law
> > > > (Fitt's law is described at
> > > > http://www.asktog.com/basics/firstPrinciples.html#fitts's%20law)
> > > >
> > > > Even when the panel has been configured to:
> > > > - not have hide buttons,
> > > >
> > > > - to make the buttons flush with the panel edge, and
> > > >
> > > > - to have 0 padding between the applets and the panel border
> > > >
> >
> > I think this a version/distribution problem. My panels are configured
> > as described and It does conform to Fitt's Law. I'm running RedHat
> > 7.0/7.2 Ximian Gnome. This problem was reported over 6 months ago, check
> > the list archive for more details. If I recall correctly, the problem
> > was happen on Sun.
>
> No, Ximian patched this. It wasn't in vanilla GNOME. And GNOME2 is
> rather different. If Ximian fixes this again, it'd be great if the
> patches got into GNOME cvs this time :-)
i believe owen made gtk2 do this last weekend.
jacob
--
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]