Re: memory allocations.
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: drepper redhat com (Ulrich Drepper)
- Cc: alan redhat com (Alan Cox), chabotc reviewboard com (Chris Chabot), hp redhat com (Havoc Pennington), iain ximian com (iain), gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: memory allocations.
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:33:49 -0500 (EST)
> > counts cuts the number close to zero. Thread specific pools are a huge
> > win in many studies I've seen
>
> This is already done.
Cool.
> There is not much more you can do to the malloc. I haven't written
> the malloc code so you cannot blame my constantly cited inability.
8)
> If this isn't possible go with GC. gcc did this because memory
> handling was too complex (and obstacks too dangerous).
Virtual memory optimised GC is hard (as the mozilla people are finding)
Alan
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
