Re: Lets get branches names right this time (was: Re: Proposed release process/plans)
- From: Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: Gediminas Paulauskas <menesis delfi lt>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Lets get branches names right this time (was: Re: Proposed release process/plans)
- Date: 13 Jun 2002 15:49:27 -0500
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 15:45, Bill Haneman wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 21:02, Chema Celorio wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 12:39, Bill Haneman wrote:
>
> > > OK;
> > >
> > > Does anyone have an issue with me using gnome-2-0-0 for
> ^^^
>
> Why does my choice to do this impact your choice to branch 2-0 away from
> HEAD sooner? Or perhaps you misunderstood my question...
yes, i didn't got the "me" part. I thought you where talking about
policy in general.
Chema
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
