Re: Icon Love (long-ish)
- From: Calum Benson <calum benson sun com>
- To: GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Icon Love (long-ish)
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:30:26 +0000
Alex Larsson wrote:
> Why didn't anyone comment on my suggestion to use 1->9 and 9->1 instead.
> It seems that this would solve the issue for everyone.
Another alternative I've seen that implies neither alphabetical or
numerical sort is to use an icon showing three shapes in
ascending/descending size, e.g:
. o O for "ascending sort", and
----->
O o . for "descending sort"
<----
(The arrow is necessary for locales where people don't interpret things
naturally from left to right.)
One of the Sun HCI guys has just recommended reading "Global Interface
Design: A Guide to Designing International User Interfaces", by Tony
Fernandez. Apparently it "has a lot about icon issues, and some of them
will raise the hair on your neck", but unfortunately it's now out of
print. (Somebody's selling a copy on Amazon's zShops if you're quick,
though...)
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson ireland sun com Desktop Engineering Group
http://www.sun.ie +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]