Re: Publishing threads from gnome-private archives

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 12:50:08AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Michael Meeks">
> 
> > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:23, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > > So, my first inclination was to request permission from everyone I'd
> > > quote, but it would be prohibitive for some of the "more active"
> > > threads. :-) Would it be unkind to assume that technical discussion can
> > > be republished and/or quoted, even though gnome-private still has
> > > private archives? (I would like to see these busted open anyway, so
> > > perhaps that would help.)
> > 
> > 	It'd be very interesting to see which threads you select.
> 
> Ooops, I meant to mention some of those when Havoc asked me off-list. :-)
> 
> Some of the interesting things I've found are GNOME 2.0 planning from way
> back in '99, the reasons behind Nautilus taking over the root window, etc.
> 

Something I didn't get that Jeff clarified to me in private mail is
that most of the gnome-private archives are actually from mails to
gnome-hackers, because gnome-hackers used to be private. When we took
gnome-hackers public, then gnome-private had very little traffic.  So
that's why the (really old) gnome-private archives have a bunch of
technical discussion in them. But more recent gnome-private is mostly
empty.

Maybe everyone else picked up on this, but anyhow, I didn't. ;-)

Havoc
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers