Re: libgnomeprint brokenness ...

[Radek Doulík <rodo ximian com>]

On St, 2002-04-17 at 10:43, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 	Since it seems that the some of the release team feel incompetant to
> judge on advice as to whether gnome-print should be in the platform for
> Gnome 2.0, we need to re-build consensus here first:
> 
> 	It would be good if people who agree, could agree here.
> 
> 	So here goes (again):
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> 	With the departure for sabbatical of the gnome-print maintainer, and a
> subsequent review of the code and API it seems there is a worrying
> level of immaturity / brokenness in there.

Do you have more info from this review? Most importantly, how does it
play together with Pango?

> 	This need not particularly be a problem, since libgnomeprint[ui] is
> used at most lightly in a few Gnome applications, if we could hoist the
> printing modules out of the developer platform.

Seems resonably to me.

Cheers
Radek


_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers