Re: Pango branched

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:59:35AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >   So as announced during the Talk at Guadec I expect to grow the
> > libxml2 API in the near future (no backward incompatible change are
> > expected),
> 
> 	Ideal, but we certainly need some sort of mini branch to do
> stabilization on, and make minimal changes for bug fixes etc.
> 
> 	Is that reasonable ?

 If you can come up with a clear an concrete case where/why this is
needed, why not. But unless absolutely necessary I prefer not having
to handle this, I honnestly don't see the point, though I see the
associated cost. For the moment all of my new developments are outside
CVS, so it's already the case, but once I decide it's ripe enough 
for propagation I really do want to avoid branch maintainance (or to
put it frankly, I won't manage any branch myself).

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers