Re: Gnome 2.0 policy question
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- To: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnome 2.0 policy question
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:38:04 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:37:50PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Do we have a CVS policy for committing changes to applications to
> > build them with Gnome 2.0 API's - should the 1.2/1.4 version become a
> > CVS branch ?
>
> Not sure if it's a "policy" of any sort, but that has certainly been the
> common practice in the heavily worked on things at the moment
> (libgnome, libgnomeui, gnome-core, gnome-applets ... some others I
> guess). It sounds like a sensible path to follow.
>
What we certainly don't want is everybody creating a news cvs module for
the port to gnome 2!
> Malcolm
>
> --
> Success always occurs in private and failure in full view.
>
>
Sander
I haven't been vampired. You've been Weatherwaxed.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]