Re: Our (real) problems
- From: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- To: danw ximian com, michael ximian com
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Our (real) problems
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:45:01 +0100 (BST)
Michael wrote, regarding component lifecycle management and 'AWOL detection':
>Hi Dan,
> Since we're interested only particularly in local machines,
I smell an assumption...
Dunno what the "sell-by" date is on this one, but I think it has a limited shelf
life ;-)
-Bill
>for control / control-frame cases we can rely on the somewhat 'nicer'
>more predictable and rapid behavior of UDSs vs. general TCP timeouts I
>think, and avoid pinging.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael.
>
>--
> mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
>_______________________________________________
>gnome-hackers mailing list
>gnome-hackers gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
>
>
------
Bill Haneman x19279
Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
Sun Microsystems Ireland
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]