Re: RTF in the canvas?
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Christopher James Lahey <clahey ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: RTF in the canvas?
- Date: 12 May 2001 19:39:18 -0400
Christopher James Lahey <clahey ximian com> writes:
> On 12 May 2001 13:13:01 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > Most of the interactive damage in the canvas currently can
> > be summarized by one word:
> >
> > art_rect_list_from_uta ()
> >
> > Redrawing in little pieces is simply not a good idea in almost
> > every case.
>
> As long as you prepare in the update method and do a very fast drawing
> routine in the draw method, shouldn't this not be an issue? I've seen
> lots of apps be sped up considerably by moving things from the draw
> method to the update method.
When you get to the speed that a graphics card can blit, then you
can pretend the update is instantaneous.
Until you get there, doing partial updates causes tearing; doing
partial updates faster causes faster tearing.
And should people have to worry about making their draw methods
blazingly fast just to try and reduce the effect of a misguided
"optimization"?
Owen
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]