Re: API docs [ was Re: gnome-vfs 1.0.1 is available ]
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: API docs [ was Re: gnome-vfs 1.0.1 is available ]
- Date: 10 May 2001 10:10:56 +0930
> Personally, I think we can do a _lot_ better than the Java docs. The
> member function docs often are just reiteration of the name, and the
> class documentation is quite frequently insufficient. There are good
> topic overview docs, but they are not integrated with the API docs at
> all.
Well with the wonderfully long and excruciatingly concise function names
(for trivial methods) that java programmers like to use, repeating the
method name is all you *can* do to document a function, without just
sounding stupid. gtk+ and gnome functions often follow a similar trend.
e.g.
toString()
Converts to a string.
I mean, what else can you say?
(I knew some guy who made a Utils.removeLeadingAndTrailingSpaces()
method. That always cracked me up!!!)
> > The GTK+ docs are ugly to start with, hard to navigate beyond that,
>
> Do you have specific suggestions?
Last time i looked, it was like trying to read a manual that had been
printed on fanfold paper, with no indexing or page numbers, and no
inter-page layout; its just painful, you have to do a lot of manual (no
pun intended!) searching. Yes i'm overexagerating, but thats the
general impression I got when I tried to use it. I gave up and stuck to
the source.
!Z
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]