Re: GNOME 1.6

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Jeff Waugh <jdub aphid net> writes:

> Hi all,
> 
> In the midst of all this discussion about the next versions of GTK+ and
> gnome-libs - all of which has been intriguing to watch from the sidelines -
> two points have really stood out as Highly Important Stuff.
> 
> First, that we should release more regularly, and second, that GNOME 2.0
> should kick some serious arse. I would love to see GNOME 2.0 be the rich,
> component-based system many of us have imagined for so long...
> 
> But that might be a little tough when you balance it with a hopeful release
> this side of Chinese New Year. ;) How does the following sound:
> 
> GNOME 1.6: Bugfixes, improved Nautilus release and integration (significant
>            update), Evolution (or significant update if released earlier),
>            new features backported from GNOME 2.0 where appropriate. Strong
>            GNOME 2.0 Preview release included.
> 
> GNOME 2.0: Platform release, GTK+ 2.0, library refactoring, component model
>            for whole desktop, etc, etc, etc.
> 
> Not sure if anything less than "the whole hog" of a new platform release is
> being considered, but a path like this may save any dreadfully long
> gestation periods for GNOME 2.0, and also buy some time to make GNOME 2.0
> the magical release it should be.

It would only make sense to do a GNOME-1.6 if we had a second
team of hackers to do GNOME-1.6 without taking time away
from GNOME-2.0. I don't think we do....

Slowing down GNOME-2.0 to do GNOME-1.6 makes very little sense,
because the major improvements GNOME-2.0 offers can only come with
GNOME-2.0. 

Regards,
                                        Owen

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers