Re: more gnome 2 proposal

[Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc cu-portland edu>]

On 12 Mar 2001 22:08:35 -0600, Cody Russell wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2001 02:52:36 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> >       Using HEAD is a mistake (reasons available in my doc)
> 
> 
> Whatever branch name is used, I think it would be good if all core GNOME
> modules would start using a standardized branch naming scheme.  Some
> things are in HEAD, some things are in FOO_1_0, some things are in
> FOR_PANEL, or whatever.  I've never yet found a way to list all branches
> available on a module using either cvs or Bonsai.  I think a common
> branch naming (be it HEAD, or GNOME_2_0) would be very good for
> everyone.

Well, you just haven't gotten intimately familiar with the CVS info
documents (don't, it's not worth the pain).  Anyway, to get a list of
the branches available in a module, try doing 'cvs -z3 log ChangeLog
|less'.  The branches available will be listed near the top.  I just use
ChangeLog because it's a file that exists in every branch.  It's not
exactly user friendly, but then again, neither is the rest of CVS.

    Greg


_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers