Re: Don't bloat Gnome-libs, bloat Gtk+/Glib
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Don't bloat Gnome-libs, bloat Gtk+/Glib
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:27:31 -0800
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 07:13:16PM -0500, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > We have yet another GNOME 2 writeup...
> > http://canvas.gnome.org/~mjs/proposal.html
> >
> > I think the largest and most substantive point of disagreement right
> > now is library packaging, i.e. lots of small modules vs. two big
> > modules.
>
> While I agree with much of the propsal, and particularly the
> splitting of the libraries I must say I'm mildly amused that members of
> the Gtk+ team have the gall to lecture Gnome people on modularity [1]
Getting back to the proposal then. Could you elaborate which parts of the
proposal itself you agree and disagree with?
George
--
George <jirka 5z com>
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-- Napoleon Bonaparte
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]