Re: GNOME hosting
- From: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- To: <gnome-sysadmin gnome org>, <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME hosting
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:02:29 -0500 (EST)
On 8 Mar 2001, Martin Baulig wrote:
> "Chris J. DiBona" <chris dibona com> writes:
>
> > yes, history of old packages is important. It's why we created sourceforge
> > in the first place, we'd go to find old packages and they wouldn't be easy
> > to find.
>
> Well, as long as things are actively maintained, it may be worth to keep
> binary packages as well. For instance, I think it'd make a lot of sense to
> keep our old binaries for major GNOME releases.
>
> However, if someone made some RPMS back in 1998 and then nobody ever touched
> that directory since that time, then we should remove these stuff.
How about keeping full FTP xferlogs for a month, and using them to
determine what really needs keeping?
-- Elliot
The truth knocks on my door, and I say
"Go away. I'm looking for the truth"
...and so it goes away.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]