Re: GNOME hosting

["Chris J. DiBona" <chris dibona com>]

I'm of the opinion that diskspace is cheap, and finding a binary for some
old package that to rebuild would be troubling is a good thing. 

But so long as old sourcecode is around, it's not awful to kill binaries.

 Chris

--  
Marketing Manager, OSDN Events	              |   http://www.osdn.com/events
Grant Chair, Linux International.             |   http://www.li.org
Co-editor, Open Sources	                      |   http://www.dibona.com

On 8 Mar 2001, David Mason wrote:

> "Chris J. DiBona" <chris dibona com> writes:
> 
> > yes, history of old packages is important. It's why we created sourceforge
> > in the first place, we'd go to find old packages and they wouldn't be easy
> > to find. 
> 
> 
> There is a difference between archives of important things - and
> millions of binaries for one app. To pick on Gnumeric (just because it
> comes to mind) there were releases that lasted a few hours - we don't
> need those binaries. We have a section in ftp which has major GNOME
> milestones - we should keep that - it is interesting, it is
> history. We should not keep old binaries that are not interesting and
> do not provide much historical context to GNOME.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave
> -- 
> 
> 
> David Mason
> Red Hat Advanced Development Labs
> dcm redhat com (919)547-0012 x248
> 


_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers