Re: GNOME hosting
- From: David Mason <dcm redhat com>
- To: "Chris J. DiBona" <chris dibona com>
- Cc: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>, gnome-sysadmin gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME hosting
- Date: 08 Mar 2001 15:43:14 -0500
"Chris J. DiBona" <chris dibona com> writes:
> yes, history of old packages is important. It's why we created sourceforge
> in the first place, we'd go to find old packages and they wouldn't be easy
> to find.
There is a difference between archives of important things - and
millions of binaries for one app. To pick on Gnumeric (just because it
comes to mind) there were releases that lasted a few hours - we don't
need those binaries. We have a section in ftp which has major GNOME
milestones - we should keep that - it is interesting, it is
history. We should not keep old binaries that are not interesting and
do not provide much historical context to GNOME.
Cheers,
Dave
--
David Mason
Red Hat Advanced Development Labs
dcm redhat com (919)547-0012 x248
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]