Re: GNOME Enhancement Procedure

[Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>]

On 19 Jun 2001 23:40:27 +0500, Dan Winship wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2001 13:25:49 -0500, Chema Celorio wrote:
> > > > Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes: 
> > > > > First, even though I think we do need some kind of more formal
> > > > > process, this one sounds a bit too bureaucratic for my tastes what
> > > > > with all the rules and regulations.
> > 
> > I second Maciej here, this is not how Free Software works.
> 
> You're right. The way Free Software works is that once a project reaches
> a certain size, you have to have one of:
>     * A benevolent dictator (or dictators) whose decisions everyone
>       accepts
>     * Massive infighting and backstabbing among developers
>     * A fork into two smaller projects

I agree. So which one do we want ?

we are currenlty in 2, option 3 is not really an option. 
So either we say in option 2 or go back to option 1 which nobody seems
to like.




_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers