Re: GNOME Enhancement Procedure
- From: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- To: Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Enhancement Procedure
- Date: 19 Jun 2001 23:40:27 +0500
On 19 Jun 2001 13:25:49 -0500, Chema Celorio wrote:
> > > Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes:
> > > > First, even though I think we do need some kind of more formal
> > > > process, this one sounds a bit too bureaucratic for my tastes what
> > > > with all the rules and regulations.
>
> I second Maciej here, this is not how Free Software works.
You're right. The way Free Software works is that once a project reaches
a certain size, you have to have one of:
* A benevolent dictator (or dictators) whose decisions everyone
accepts
* Massive infighting and backstabbing among developers
* A fork into two smaller projects
> Things should get discussed and your voice shall be heard by how big
> your contributions are
Yuck. "It's better to be prolific than it is to be correct."
-- Dan
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]