Re: GNOME 2.0 Defaults
- From: Calum Benson <calum benson sun com>
- To: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Defaults
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:44:05 +0100
Jeff Waugh wrote:
> There's only one UI/Usability project now; unless you count g-g-l, which no
> one really does any more. The usability project is concerned more with the
> deeper usability issues within GNOME, and is quite a bit more important than
> this little project.
Well, as I said in reply to your corresponding post on the usability
list, I wouldn't consider this less important at all-- working out the
best defaults for the desktop would certainly benefit from a usability
study as much as any of the other things we've considered so far.
> I guess the difference is really 'branding' and polish versus seriously
> hardcore usability hacking and studies. :) These sorts of discussions would
> be off topic for usability gnome org
At the risk of repeating myself, I disagree... certainly within Sun,
application defaults and branding are issues that are largely tackled by
the usability team, so I don't see why they couldn't be tackled by the
GNOME usability community too.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson ireland sun com Desktop Engineering Group
http://www.sun.ie +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]