Re: Intolerable CVS behaviour

[Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>]

Hi guys,

Ok, I haven't read the rest of this thread yet, I just woke up and started
to read my mail.

However, if we hadn't already Cc:ed him in this thread, I think my policy
on how to proceed would have something like if he apologises for his fault
and realizes why his behaviour was wrong (committing such changes to a module
without asking the maintainer), then we should give him his CVS account back.

At the moment, it doesn't look for me as if he's realizing that he was wrong,
he seems to try to excuse his failure with pretending that what he did was
technically right.

Just my opinion for the moment.

Martin



Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek rudy mif pg gda pl> writes:

> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:35:18PM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > > 
> > > Tomasz has had access to CVS for about two years. 
> > > 
> > 
> >   Well if someone changes completely the structure
> > of a module, doing cvs delete/cvs add without reading the HACKING
> > nor contacting the maintainers, well this person should not be allowed
> > to commit directly. Restricting them to send patches to the maintainer
> > is okay.
> 
> OK. You have right about my fault.
> But look ones agan on my changes. Is it correct (in spe) or not. If I
> remove on this big change some files I want apologize.
> But if this changes is correct (at all) and if something require fix IMHO
> is better fix this instead reverte rhis.
> I'm not XLM specialist but I know very well autoconf/automake abilities
> and twings which I know.
>  
> >   I can't understand that after 2 years of access one can ignore
> > that doing this kind of things is simply improper.
> > 
> > > >   I ask he be first removed CVS commit capability,
> > > > and I ask for help to recover the previous setup of
> > > > gnome-xml head,
> > > 
> > > I think Tomasz is aware of his mistake (or will soon be).  I see no
> > > reason to remove his CVS account given his new grasped knowledge from
> > > your message.
> > 
> >   I don't want ACLs but I want the rules to be clear. Communication,
> > not restrictions. There is multiple ways to get people to follow the
> > law, I prefer education. And if someone still misbehaves, then
> > take action ...
> 
> Yes this is my mistake. I'm not read before HACKING documment.
> But ones more .. look on this change and evaluate them and simple say is
> it correct or not.
> 
> kloczek
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> *Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają*
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek rudy mif pg gda pl*
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
> 
> 

-- 
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers