Re: CVS policy

[Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>]

Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com> writes:

> Well, you are making this statement assuming that ACLs cannot be
> implemented nicely. I contend that they can be, but of course am unable to
> provide such an implementation at the moment :)

Well, in addition to that I think, as soon as there is a reason why we need
to have ACLs in GNOME CVS, this is a clear and obvious sign that there's
something major wrong with it.

-- 
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers