Re: Proposed license policy
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposed license policy
- Date: 08 Dec 2000 09:02:19 -0500
Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com> writes:
> > a) puts the GNOME platform at a huge disadvantage, and unfortunately
> > some software simply can't or won't be done as free software.
>
> This does not seem to be a bad problem for KDE right now.
>
> > b) puts the GNOME platform under the control of someone other than the
> > GNOME foundation, and also puts us at a significant disadvantage
> > compared to the Microsoft platform.
>
> This again does not seem to be a problem for KDE users.
>
It is a problem. The fact that Qt has a GPL-like license has been a
strike against it in many decisions when compared to an LGPL library
like GTK. This has helped GNOME. I can't be more specific, sorry.
Havoc
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]