Re: bugzilla resolutions
- From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>
- To: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: bugzilla resolutions
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 08:46:29 +1100
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 04:31:10PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au> writes:
> > There are a bunch of bug reports that say things like
> >
> > "This app sucks, get it out of here!"
> >
> > It wouldn't feel right to file them as INCOMPLETE, since the
> > likelihood of them ever becoming complete is very small. We need to
> > have a way of throwing out the trash.
>
> Actually, bugs aren't supposed to be closed as INCOMPLETE until the
> likelyhood of them becoming complete is very small. (Hence the NeedInfo
> status.)
>
> And if somebody files a bug report:
>
> "GTK+ sucks, get it out of here"
>
> I think closing it as "NOTABUG" is fine. But again, if people want
> INVALID as well, it certainly can be included.
Oh, I'd forgotten about NOTABUG. :-(
That would be an adequate solution. I think I'll take my limited memory
away now and leave it to the experts.
Malcolm
--
Malcolm Tredinnick email: malcolm commsecure com au
CommSecure Pty Ltd
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]