Re: bugzilla work items

[Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>]

Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:

> These are the things I think need doing to bring bugzilla.gnome.org
> into line with the current plans:
> 
>  * Remove rep_platform and add os_details mediumtext field. Update
>    relevant pages.
> 
>  * Make sure all references to 'program' in publically visible places
>    read 'product' instead.
> 
>  ? Add NeedInfo status
> 
>  ? Change resolutions to match my proposal of today 
>    (INCOMPLETE/NOTABUG/NOTGNOME)
> 
>  ? lowercase enumerations in public display
> 
>  * Remove priorities entirely. 
> 
>  [ Is this what we want to do? Martin had this in his plan and no one
>    objected. The typical usage of them seems to be for tracking bugs
>    that need to be fixed for a particular release, but we have that
>    somewhat with the classification of severity into those that block
>    releases and those that don't, but its possible that some
>    people would want to make minor or trivial bugs release-critical.
>    (you mispelled my name in the README file!) ]

Hmm, that'd be a good reason to keep priorities (but rename them to something
better than P1...P5).

-- 
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers