I am not suggesting getting rid of Bash, only making a new shell that can be heralded as "easy to use" and "elegant." Umm... think of it like busybox; there are a lot of commands crammed in to one executable. we don't need to get rid of the old structure, we just need a new interface to our computers. Bash should remain Bash, Sander Vesik wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2001, delmar watkins wrote: > > > See how easy it would be to have a new, fresh, GOOD syntax for a CLI but > > keep the power user in the loop??? > > > > You can't get the power user in the loop - you just suggested breaking all > his/her scripts horribly. In fact you might easily find it hard to > actually find people who would write such shells... > > [snip] > > Sander > > One day a tortoise will learn to fly > -- Terry Pratchett, 'Small Gods'
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature