Re: Arlo, a little QA comment regarding your interview withlinux.com
- From: Alan Shutko <ats acm org>
- To: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Arlo, a little QA comment regarding your interview withlinux.com
- Date: 25 Oct 2000 14:24:27 -0400
John Sullivan <sullivan eazel com> writes:
> On the other hand, in theory anyway, hidden files are hidden for a reason --
> they aren't intended for users to futz with.
Not always. They may be hidden because you don't always want to see
them cluttering up your ~ file listing, but are definately intended to
be user-modified or user-viewed. Many of my dotfiles come under that
heading:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ats ats 259 Oct 20 09:39 .Xclients
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 211 Jul 23 13:01 .Xmodmap
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 6337 Oct 5 23:55 .Xresources
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 517 Sep 22 18:57 .aliases
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 257 Jun 9 09:32 .authinfo
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 24 Jun 9 09:32 .bash_logout
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 185 Oct 8 10:36 .bashrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 38 Sep 1 15:59 .cvsrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 9046 Oct 23 1999 .default.css
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 16138 Oct 25 10:50 .emacs
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 10258 Oct 18 15:03 .emacs-custom
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 2238 Oct 23 10:13 .emacs.bmk
drwxr-xr-x 2 ats ats 4096 May 18 11:30 .env
-rw------- 1 ats ats 500 Jul 21 21:58 .fetchmailrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 14486 Jun 9 09:33 .fvwm2rc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 18148 Jun 9 09:33 .fvwmrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 4240 Oct 21 19:13 .gnus
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 20 Jun 9 09:33 .inputrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 559 Oct 13 16:12 .kermrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 37 Jul 9 1999 .less
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 67 Jul 9 1999 .lesskey
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 580 Sep 19 10:08 .mailcap
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 825 Sep 19 10:08 .mime.types
-rw------- 1 ats ats 245 Aug 14 11:43 .netrc
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ats ats 1351 Jun 9 09:33 .plan
-rw------- 1 ats ats 2361550 Oct 25 14:13 .procmail.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 708 Oct 16 20:53 .procmailrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 642 Oct 13 15:22 .profile
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 67 Jun 9 09:33 .project
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ats ats 24929 Jul 18 23:26 .rpmfind
-rw-rw-r-- 1 ats ats 92 Oct 7 19:20 .sawfishrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 ats ats 3394 Jul 10 17:26 .screenrc
drwx------ 2 ats ats 4096 Oct 17 23:51 .ssh
drwx------ 3 ats ats 4096 Jul 29 15:04 .ssh2
-rw------- 1 ats ats 2093 Oct 25 11:10 .xsession-errors
Furthermore, this is a choice that is very dependant on what I want to
do. Normally, I don't want to wade through 136 dot entries in my home
directory, but when I do, I want to do so for this instance, and I
don't want to have to change global settings to do it.
This is the same thing as certain settings in Netscape. I may want to
browse with java and javascript off, but turn it on for this page. Or
I may want to override the font size for a single page because of the
horrifying mess that web font use is. (For this, Netscape does have
menu items, but I've never managed to make them work.)
> Also, every menu item adds a little bit of complexity to the
> menus. If the program has 200 menu items, it is much harder to deal
> with than a program with 50 menu items.
That's very true. Which is why it's nice that with MS Office,
WordPerfect, and other older apps, you can change the menus to
incorporate commands that you use and need. It's not something that
every user uses, but those who do (like my wife) use it a _lot_. This
is an important feature, but not normally implemented because it's
harder for the programmer. The gnome-libs should, imho, provide the
infrastructure to make this easier. (Ditto keybindings and toolbar
customization.)
But what about the increased support costs? Who cares? You clearly
have to make a compromise between support costs and increasing
people's productivity. After all, support costs would be less if we
didn't have preferences at all and instead hard-coded behavior.
--
Alan Shutko <ats acm org> - In a variety of flavors!
16 days, 21 hours, 23 minutes, 6 seconds till we run away.
Some people only open up to tell you that they're closed.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]