RE: User interface suggestions
- From: David Grega <webmaster overtech zzn com>
- To: "'gnome-gui-list gnome org'" <gnome-gui-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: User interface suggestions
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 20:25:07 -0500
Please note when I said uncolored, I meant de-saturated (I didn't know that
word until an hour ago). I did not mean whited or grayscale. Whited and
grayscale are to represent disabled items whereas de-saturated items are to
be the not commonly used items. I hope this clears up some confusion.
BTW- I just made up the word uncolored aid communication of my ideas, I
didn't know it was an actual word.
- Dave
----------
From: Adrian
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 2:33 PM
To: Gguilist
Cc: David Grega
Subject: RE: User interface suggestions
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, David Grega wrote:
> Okay, let me try to ease up your confusion.
>
> Grayscaled images (as generally referred to in the programming community)
> generally take an outline of the icon, paint it in white and all other
> parts of the icon in dark gray. What I'm talking about is simply taking
> the color out of the image and making it into black and white (like
> watching a TV program in color on an old black and white TV - or if you
set
> the color on your TV to the lowest setting). The latter is what I call
> "uncolored".
>
Oh, that was exactly my idea... If you see at the suggested images
(for desktop & applications), low used icons are in "black and white"
(=uncolored=grayscaled :), most used ones are in color, and disabled ones
are "whited?" (which can be in color or uncolored too, depending of the
level of use). Now I'm sure, it has been a misunderstanding... :) Tnx
Adrian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]