Menus
- From: swittams cix compulink co uk (Simon Wittams)
- To: gnome-gui-list gnome org, swittams cix compulink co uk
- Subject: Menus
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 98 14:51 BST-1
Everybody seems to be arguing about menus atm.
Has anybody ever thought that the defaults propagated
in most desktop systems make little sense? (Exit&Close under File,etc.)
I think we should decide one of two courses:
1) Stick as far as possible to the system everybody is used to. Ie
Preferences under File...
It really is not worth attempting to fool people into thinking they are
using Win/Mac menu options if *everything* isn't the same.
2) Make an entirely new default menu structure, in which every menu
option has to be semantically viable.
Eg have an
*App(renamable) menu as the leftmost with quit, preferences etc...
* File with close, open, properties...
*Edit, for undo, redo, cut&paste etc ...
* successive Object menus (renamable) next, for commands on the currently selected
object/layer/word/CORBA exported thingy/whatever ...
* {insert|new} to insert new objects/funny characters/etc .....
*help right most ( but not right justified).
*only app and help mandatory
The thing I'm really trying to get at is that only operations relating to files
should be in the file menu...
eg in a word processor:
App file edit page paragraph {word|object|etc} help
I would prefer the 2nd choice, but if we are going for the first, which I realise is
much more likely due to the amount of work already done using this kind of model,
then we must at least keep to copying MS/Apple consistently.
Rob
o
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]