Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Menu Line Standardization

[George <jirka 5z com>]

On Mon, Aug 10, 1998 at 08:15:14AM -0700, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> John R Sheets writes:
>  > Then they won't get so-and-so level of compliance.  And they're
>  > free to.  They can still release their app in whatever form they
>  > like.  It may be a killer GNOME app, with very advanced features.
>  > But until it has good, reliable docs, it should not, IMHO, get
>  > higher compliance.  If compliance is important enough to the
>  > programmer, he will deal with the docs, or get someone else to do
>  > them.
>  >  It is more important to have GNOME in a solid, well-documented
>  > state, that it is to play PR games with programmers (of which, I am
>  > one, so I'm slipping my own neck into the noose, too).
> 
> My gosh! The voice of reason! That's three out of four or five coders
> I know on this list who agree that documentation is a high
> priority... You non-coders paying attention?

I don't think most people understand this ...

if you want docs ... you write em ...

if I feel like my apps hould be documented ... I'll write some docs ... if
I don't ... I won't ... I'll wait for someone to do it ...

George

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
George Lebl <jirka@5z.com> http://www.5z.com/jirka/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  The following implements RSA in perl and is illegal to export from the US:

          #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
          $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
          lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)