Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Menu Line Standardization



Yeah.  What do you think my main contribution has been to this project?
My C has a LONG way to go before it catches up to my English.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
                Soren Harward               | Windows 95/98 DOES come
 Internet Information Systems Administrator | with a tool to recover
               Cinternet, Inc.              | from Registry
 Voice: 891-1228        soren@cinternet.net | corruption.
      http://www.cinternet.net/~soren/      | It's called 'FDISK'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 10 Aug 1998, Chris Jantzen wrote:

>John R Sheets writes:
> > Then they won't get so-and-so level of compliance.  And they're
> > free to.  They can still release their app in whatever form they
> > like.  It may be a killer GNOME app, with very advanced features.
> > But until it has good, reliable docs, it should not, IMHO, get
> > higher compliance.  If compliance is important enough to the
> > programmer, he will deal with the docs, or get someone else to do
> > them.
> >  It is more important to have GNOME in a solid, well-documented
> > state, that it is to play PR games with programmers (of which, I am
> > one, so I'm slipping my own neck into the noose, too).
>
>My gosh! The voice of reason! That's three out of four or five coders
>I know on this list who agree that documentation is a high
>priority... You non-coders paying attention?
>



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]