Re: RGSG
- From: Stephan Pfab <pfab thales mathematik uni-ulm de>
- To: effugas best com
- Cc: gnome-gui-list gnome org, recipient list not shown:;@mathematik.uni-ulm.de
- Subject: Re: RGSG
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 11:44:25 +0200
>"Suppose you could have your word processing program act however you wanted
>it to. Lets say you pressed 'quit', but forgot to save your work to the
>hard drive. Do you want the word processing program to warn you that you
>haven't saved your work and ask you which files you wish to save? Or should
>the program ignore unsaved work in favor of proceeding with what you told it
>to do, which was 'quit'?"
>I actually plan to ask this. I'm not sure what in there is bias and what in
>there is just plain description. Help me evolve this into an askable
>question?
You still imply that an option is that they loose their work.
>Irrelevant. I was responding to those who said "Quit or Exit should just
>send a SIGKILL."
This was answered previously, t.i. knowbody wants the program
to be killed, but to end on "exit".
The program gets a notice, that it should end.
It has all the time in the world to save data.
Stephan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]