Re: RSG

["Dan Kaminsky" <effugas best com>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
To: gnome-gui-list@gnome.org <gnome-gui-list@gnome.org>
Date: Monday, August 03, 1998 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: RSG


>Dan Kaminsky <effugas@best.com> wrote:
>> CPU usage?  No higher than showing the original app...Xlab records X, so
if
>> your computer could display the stuff once, it should be able to
continually
>> display it.  Disk usage?  This is an unknown quantity as of
yet...hopefully
>> the core animations can be ripped out of the original executable?  I
dunno.
>> Size?  Well, as we agreed on the list earlier, this ain't stuff that
should
>> be integrated in the binary, but who knows, from the user response I'm
>> seeing on this, LyX could be made more usable than Word by sheer nature
of
>> the learnability factor.
>
>just a wild thought: you were looking for some way to "multihead" X stuff
>yesterday. maybe a simple streaming of the xlab record to the target
>machines would do that? <grin>


I already asked Marc about that :-)  Awaiting response.

You agree with me, btw, that screenplay, multihead, and macro are probably
very good ideas?