Re: Freeze break request (nautilus delete key)
- From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>, "release-team gnome org" <release-team gnome org>, gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Freeze break request (nautilus delete key)
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:00:06 -0400
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 16:09 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 21:50 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:50 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 21:32 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>> > > > Yeah, that is probably a good idea. Do we mention this in the docs
>> > > > anywhere else? (CC:ing docs list)
>> > >
>> > > On a few pages, I'm sure. Let me make sure I have the proposal
>> > > straight:
>> > >
>> > > * In 3.0, make Del do nothing, Ctrl+Del deletes (moves to trash).
>> > > Shift+Del would still be the keybinding for permanent delete?
>> > >
>> > > * In 3.2, Undo (Ctrl+Z?) will restore the file you just deleted.
>> > > It's just a quick shortcut, and the trash otherwise works as
>> > > it always has.
>> > >
>> > > Is that right?
>> >
>> > Yes, although undo is obviously more applicable than just for trash.
>>
>> Great. We'll deal with all the undo hotness next release
>> cycle then.
>>
>> As for Ctrl+Del, I agree it's better to make that kind of
>> change on a big point-oh release, when people expect things
>> to change. As long as we get notified of the commit, I can
>> make the docs changes pretty quickly.
>>
>> /me wonders how any technical writer can live without grep.
>
> I take this as an ack from the docs team.
>
> How about the release team acks?
I'm fine with it, approval 1/2.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]