Re: developer.gnome.org (was: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two)



Hi!

Am Dienstag, den 12.10.2010, 18:31 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> Am Dienstag, den 12.10.2010, 18:03 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid:
> > However, I am mixed about the development tools moduleset. Basically we
> > need a lot of improvements in that area and probably it is far more
> > useful to have a central point to start (like a revived
> > developer.gnome.org) that explains and shows the tools than to put them
> > in a moduleset.

First note that this developer.gnome.org thing is just something that is
in my head, don't know if this is a good idea. It sounds natural to go
to developer.gnome.org though if you want to get started with
development in GNOME.

> That would require to first kill the rest of content on
> developer.gnome.org.
> 
> I've listed the remaining stuff on developer.gnome.org in 
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-doc-list/2010-May/msg00063.html
> 
> The big problems are
> * how to tell that stuff is outdated (needs developer input as
>   I cannot judge that)

Basically everything is. Even the X stuff from Frederico describes
things now (like colormaps and GdkGC) that Company just removed from gtk
+

> * whether it is still useful for anybody to keep it / archive it
> * in case it's still useful: whether to move it to some archive
>   (live.gnome.org? project websites?) and to create permanent 
>   redirects in developer.gnome.org's htaccess to avoid 404s.

It has some historic value and I guess it wouldn't harm to keep it where
it is (possible with some redirections to make URLs still work but move
it out of the way). Than have a small "archive" link on the frontpage
while the rest of the content would be new.

Regards,
Johannes


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]