Hi! Am Dienstag, den 12.10.2010, 18:31 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper: > Am Dienstag, den 12.10.2010, 18:03 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid: > > However, I am mixed about the development tools moduleset. Basically we > > need a lot of improvements in that area and probably it is far more > > useful to have a central point to start (like a revived > > developer.gnome.org) that explains and shows the tools than to put them > > in a moduleset. First note that this developer.gnome.org thing is just something that is in my head, don't know if this is a good idea. It sounds natural to go to developer.gnome.org though if you want to get started with development in GNOME. > That would require to first kill the rest of content on > developer.gnome.org. > > I've listed the remaining stuff on developer.gnome.org in > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-doc-list/2010-May/msg00063.html > > The big problems are > * how to tell that stuff is outdated (needs developer input as > I cannot judge that) Basically everything is. Even the X stuff from Frederico describes things now (like colormaps and GdkGC) that Company just removed from gtk + > * whether it is still useful for anybody to keep it / archive it > * in case it's still useful: whether to move it to some archive > (live.gnome.org? project websites?) and to create permanent > redirects in developer.gnome.org's htaccess to avoid 404s. It has some historic value and I guess it wouldn't harm to keep it where it is (possible with some redirections to make URLs still work but move it out of the way). Than have a small "archive" link on the frontpage while the rest of the content would be new. Regards, Johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part