Re: completed gataxx doc

[Ryan Paul <gaerdin gmail com>]

I'm relieved to hear that my work passes the "nothing seriously wrong at
first glance" test. Now that I know I'm not making any egregious
mistakes, I'm confident enough to tackle more documentation.

Should I pick another GNOME game and run with it? Are there other more
urgent GDP tasks for which additional help is currently needed?

Thanks!

-- Ryan


On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 08:23 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 22:02 -0700, Ryan Paul wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just finished the new gataxx docs. I have attached a patch to this
> > e-mail as well as the complete docbook xml file. Comments and criticism
> > are appreciated. Did I do everything right?
> 
> Hi Ryan,
> 
> This looks really good, though I didn't yet do a comprehensive
> technical or editorial review.  I've noticed a number of people
> taking a crack at the gnome-games documentation lately.  In the
> past, Callum McKenzie did the documentation maintenance, rather
> than leaving it with the GDP.  Has anybody talked with the new
> maintenance team about their plans?  (Hmm, I guess that's my
> job, isn't it?)
> 
> --
> Shaun
> 
>