Re: State of the OMF effort

From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
To: Alexander Winston <alexander winston comcast net>
Cc: Ismael Olea <ismael olea org>, omf metalab unc edu, ldp-meta franklin metalab unc edu, "gnome-doc-list gnome org" <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, LuCAS Desarrollo <lucas-desarrollo listas hispalinux es>
Subject: Re: State of the OMF effort
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:04:11 +0000

Alexander Winston wrote:

On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 18:40, Ismael Olea wrote:

	Hi!

	What is the state of the OMF effor? I'm revisiting the URL and finding
that the  http://www.ibiblio.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi link does not exist
anymore.

	We are here thinking about the possibility of writing a revision of the
OMF specification. What do you think about this?



I think that we're getting rid of ScrollKeeper and OMF in 2.7.x/2.8.x.
Not sure, though.


What would these be replaced with?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: State of the OMF effort
  - From: Malcolm Tredinnick

References:
- State of the OMF effort
  - From: Ismael Olea
- Re: State of the OMF effort
  - From: Alexander Winston

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]