Re: State of the OMF effort

From: Alexander Winston <alexander winston comcast net>
To: Ismael Olea <ismael olea org>
Cc: omf metalab unc edu, ldp-meta franklin oit unc edu, "gnome-doc-list gnome org" <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, LuCAS Desarrollo <lucas-desarrollo listas hispalinux es>
Subject: Re: State of the OMF effort
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:32:21 -0500

On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 18:40, Ismael Olea wrote:
> 	Hi!
> 
> 	What is the state of the OMF effor? I'm revisiting the URL and finding
> that the  http://www.ibiblio.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi link does not exist
> anymore.
> 
> 	We are here thinking about the possibility of writing a revision of the
> OMF specification. What do you think about this?

I think that we're getting rid of ScrollKeeper and OMF in 2.7.x/2.8.x.
Not sure, though.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Follow-Ups:
- Re: State of the OMF effort
  - From: Sander Vesik

References:
- State of the OMF effort
  - From: Ismael Olea

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]