Re: doc-i18n-tool

[Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth gnu org>]

I just briefly wanted to mention that I have no problem with having
something like this in intltool, when the technical things are sorted
out.

Kenneth

PS.: Darin, did you look at how the XST team uses xml with their perl
scripts? There is a xml.pl script that seems to replace the CPAN XML
module 

On ons, 2001-10-10 at 21:46, Darin Adler wrote:
> on 10/10/01 11:38 AM, Jonathan Blandford at jrb redhat com wrote:
> 
> > Should we try to put this in intl-tools?  It's Darin's call of
course,
> > but I think that if it manages to increase the number of translated
docs
> > then it's a good thing.  As a non-translator, I'd appreciate it if
those
> > actually doing the translating could provide feedback.
> 
> Adding this to intltool would make sense to me in theory. It does fit
with
> the general purpose of intltool. There are a few practical matters to
> consider:
> 
>     - I'm only 1 of the 3 maintainers of intltool, so it's not
completely my
> call!
>     - the current intltool has nothing compiled in it. It's all just
scripts
> and m4 macros that get installed.
>     - the current intltool doesn't have dependencies on libxml or even
glib.
>     - the tools in intltool come with simple ways to use them in
project
> makefiles -- we'd want to come up with that for this too -- in the
case of
> the other tools, we used them in some projects to get a sense with how
they
> fit into the build process before we packaged them
> 
> I'd be happy to work with you to get this into intltool, if we have
> consensus that makes sense.
> 
>     -- Darin
>