Re: Style guide topic - compound nouns.
- From: Chris Lyttle <chris wilddev net>
- To: Pat Costello <Patrick Costello Sun COM>
- Cc: Gnome Doc list <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Style guide topic - compound nouns.
- Date: 12 Dec 2001 10:19:14 -0800
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 07:42, Pat Costello wrote:
>
> Compound Noun Discussion
> ========================
>
> Conclusion:
>
> - I vote for consistency in forming GNOME UI the class of *bar terms. Therefore,
> the terms should be of the one form, or the other, wherever possible.
>
> - Given what we know about the development of compound nouns, I'd vote for the
> solid form for *bar terms, when the term is in current usage in both open and
> solid form. However, there might be some *bar terms that might never be accepted
> in wide usage in the solid form, for example "location bar" and these terms
> would have to remain as excpetions. Nevertheless, we should strive for
> consistency as far as possible.
>
Wow Thanks for this Pat. This provided a lot of clarification of the
discussion. I tend to agree with Pat, that we should use the compound
form.
Chris
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]