Re: Where we'll put docs for control-center
- From: "Rebecca J. Walter" <rjp mail tele dk>
- To: Kevin Breit <battery841 mediaone net>
- Cc: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Where we'll put docs for control-center
- Date: 11 Aug 2001 15:48:29 +0200
I personally like the GIMP help browser and it isn't heavy. I won't
even install nautilus on my machines. If you require users to use
nautilus for help, many of them will run away screaming and go find
another desktop. Maybe a look at the GIMP help browser could help adapt
things for GNOME.
On 12 Aug 2001 00:17:11 -0500, Kevin Breit wrote:
> On 10 Aug 2001 23:53:08 +0200, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> > perhaps it means we need to use something different for a help browser.
> > in my opinion, nautilus is way too heavy to even CONSIDER for this.
>
> Rebecca,
> Hallaluia (sp?)!!! Seriously though. I don't understand entirely why
> Greg feels that Nautilus IS the current solution for our help problems.
>
> - Nautilus, in itself, is a heavy program (don't deny it). Back at
> Ximian, I could tolerate reading documentation in it. But here on this
> 300Mhz/64MB box...well, I want help, not my disk to swap. As the end
> user, I don't want to wait 30 seconds for my help stuff to show. The
> average computer user has the attention span of 15 seconds before you
> lose them (look at me for an example ;). While a lot of us aren't on
> such old hardware as myself, I think a good portion of us...are.
>
> - This is probably a solvable problem. But, it's how we treat the
> sidebar. If you go more than 2 or 3 levels into the tree in the Help
> tab, you need to stretch out the sidebar. This is a nusance for the
> user. Then when you make it wider, it's too big to be a sidebar, and at
> this point, arguably, deserves its own window or frame, not a sidebar.
>
> So...I've said some pretty anti-Nautilus words. I could be a jerk and
> go on, or I could propose some half-assed idea that PROBALBY won't ever
> be implimented. I'll go for the later ;)
>
> - I'd really like to see ghb2 be released. I'm sure Greg is dying here.
> Seriously though. From what I can tell, ghb ISN'T a big piece of code.
> It seems to be basically a window with HTML rendering widgets. I like
> this idea. Why don't we make a BASIC help browser. Or how about lets
> take a que from Apple Computers? It's its own application. It'll open
> up in its own window. It'll have its own searching, categorization, doc
> viewer, etc. Wana embed it in your application? Good, it's all
> bonoboized.
>
> Why do this? We can do a help system...the right way. We can probably
> design the UI ourselves (with input of course). We can make it run on
> older and newer hardware alike. We won't be bound to Nautilus or
> whatever other things are there. The user not want help at all? Great,
> don't install it AT ALL!
>
> That's my opinion and what I'd dig :)
>
> Kevin Breit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-doc-list mailing list
> gnome-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]