Re: < vs. >
- From: Telsa Gwynne <hobbit aloss ukuu org uk>
- To: GDP <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: < vs. >
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:44:10 +0100
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 11:41:45AM +0300 or thereabouts, Ali Abdin wrote:
> Using > /IS/ valid XML - either way, (according to Owen) it is Valid
> XML. I think using < for '<' and '>' for '>' is inconsistent behavior.
> '>' should be used for '>' - You might as well do this now when you
> are updating your docs for GNOME 1.4
I agree with Ali.
My take is simple. Which of these looks more symmetrical and consistent
and makes more sense to new folk?
<something>
<something>
With the second form, I can see where I am. It's.. prettier :)
Telsa
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
