Re: < vs. >
- From: Ali Abdin <aliabdin aucegypt edu>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: < vs. >
- Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2000 22:17:22 -0200
* Owen Taylor (otaylor redhat com) wrote at 22:16 on 09/09/00:
>
> Ali Abdin <aliabdin aucegypt edu> writes:
>
> > It appears that in some docs (GDP Handbook) instead of '<' you have < -
> > This is correct of course - but it appears that you use '>' instead of >
> >
> > I think all docs should convert the '>' symbol to the > entity (of course
> > this only applies to the parts /in between/ the tags - not the tags
> > themselves).
>
> I think it is more elegant to use >, but it is not required
> for XML or SGML except in in the sequence ']]>' (See the XML spec,
> section 2.4)
Thanks for pointing this out :)
For consistencies sake we should all use > in docs instead of '>' unless
somebody has soem compelling reason not to (this should be done during the
revision of docs for GNOME 1.4)
Regards,
Ali
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]